01981nas a2200217   4500008004100000020001500041245008800056210006900144300001200213490000600225520127600231653001501507653001401522653001501536653002101551653001401572653001601586100001901602700002301621856011901644       1992                        eng d  a000000000000aPhylogeny of the subfamilies of the family Braconidae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea)0 aPhylogeny of the subfamilies of the family Braconidae Hymenopter  a199-2350 v83 aA phylogenetic analysis of the subfamilies of the family Braconidae Nees, 1812 is presented. The analysis employing 96 phylogenetically informative characters was performed using the computer- ized parsimony programmes PAUP and Hennig86. The cladograms obtained show that the Bracon- idae can be divided into three major groups of subfamilies. These are a lineage comprising the mainly ectoparasitic cyclostomes and relatives, and two advanced endoparasitic groups, both apparently derived from somewhere near the endoparasitic cyclostome subfamily Rogadinae Foerster, 1862 sensu stricto. As a result of the phylogenetic analysis subfamily rank is given to the Exothecinae Foerster, 1862 (including the Hormiini Foerster, 1862), the Rhyssalinae Foerster, 1862 (including the Pambolini Marshall, 1885), the Charmontinae van Achterberg, 1979, and the Microtypinae Szépligeti, 1908. The tribes Meteorini Cresson, 1887 and Muesebeckiini Mason, 1969 are retained as tribes because this anal- ysis did not provide conclusive arguments to separate these groups from the Euphorinae Foerster, 1862 sensu stricto and the Ichneutinae Foerster, 1862 sensu stricto, respectively. The limits of the sub- family Rogadinae Foerster, 1862 are narrowed to include only endoparasitic taxa.10aBraconidae10ametasomal10amorphology10aovipositor-shape10aphylogeny10asubfamilies1 aQuicke, D.L.J.1 avan Achterberg, C.  uhttps://insectafgseag.myspecies.info/en/content/phylogeny-subfamilies-family-braconidae-hymenoptera-ichneumonoidea01228nas a2200169   4500008004100000245020000041210006900241300000800310490000700318520050800325653001700833653001500850653001500865653001400880100001900894856014500913       2004                        eng d00aA new species of Latana Cameron (Hymenoptera : Braconidae : Braconinae) from Kibale Forest National Park, western Uganda, with the first host record of the genus confirmed by molecular techniques0 anew species of Latana Cameron Hymenoptera Braconidae Braconinae   a1-80 v123 aThe genus Latana Cameron is recognized as being a member of the Braconinae and a new species, L. keijua Laurenne & Quicke, parasitic on lamiine cerambycid beetle larvae in western Uganda is illustrated and described as new. DNA sequence data were used to confirmthe host–parasitoid association. A key is provided to separate the new species from the type-species of the genus.Observation of ovipositor buckling is presented,andthe distri- bution of facial protuberances in the Braconidae is discussed.10adna sequence10amorphology10aovipositor10aphylogeny1 aLaurenne, N.M.  uhttps://insectafgseag.myspecies.info/en/content/new-species-latana-cameron-hymenoptera-braconidae-braconinae-kibale-forest-national-park-wes03487nas a2200217   4500008004100000245011800041210007000159300001200229490000700241520271400248653001602962653001202978653002002990653001503010653001203025653002303037653001403060653001603074100002403090856015503114       2009                        eng d00aFilogenia de avispas del género Netelia (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) con énfasis en las especies costarricenses0 aFilogenia de avispas del género Netelia Hymenoptera Ichneumonida  a213-2380 v573 aPhylogeny of wasps of the genus Netelia (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) with emphasis on Costa Rican species. Results on the first cladistic analysis of the genus Netelia are presented. The analysis was carried out with the aid of the Hennig86 and Tree Gardener 2.2 programs, using a matrix of 79 taxa and 149 char- acters, based mainly on external morphology and male genitalia; only three characters are related to the natural history of the species. Within the in-group, representative species of the 11 subgenera of Netelia described in the world were included, although almost 80% of the species examined are from Costa Rica. To test the monophyly of the genus, five tryphonine species - Neliopisthus yui, Chiloplatys lucens, Phytodietus (Neuchorus) penai, P. (N.) lindus and P. (Phytodietus) moragai - were also included in the study group. Labena zerita (Labeninae) was used as an out-group. The search strategies of the trees included phylogenetic reconstruction by parsimony, without and with successive weighting of characters, through the commands bb *and mhennig*. In the analysis without successive weighting, 1 211 equally parsimonious trees with a length of 649 steps, Ci of 23 and Ri of 68, were obtained. In the analysis with successive weighting 1 211 trees with a length of 719 steps, Ci of 20 and Ri of 64, were obtained. The manifold cladograms obtained were summarized through two Majority Rule Consensuses trees, one for each rearch strategy. Support was found for the monophyly of the genus Netelia, and the subgenera N. (Apatagium), N. (Bessobates), N. (Monomacrodon), N. (Parabates), N. (Protonetelia), N. (Toxochilus) and N. (Longiterebates), although this last subgenus was only monophyletic in the analysis without successive weighting. Phylogenetic support was also obtained for the species groups leo, unguicularis and emorsa proposed by Townes (1938) in the subgenus N. (Netelia). The results support the synonymy of N. (Toxochiloides) with the group emorsa in the New World. Phylogenetic support was not found for the subgenera N. (Netelia), N. (Prosthodocis) and N. (Paropheltes), nor for the species groups virgata in N. (Bessobates) and geminata Townes in N. (Netelia). Nor was support found for a phylogenetic relation between the subgenera N. (Apatagium) and N. (Monomacrodon). Finally, with the results obtained here, the presence in Costa Rica of the subgenera N. (Longiterebates) and N. (Parabates), as documented by Gauld (1997), is rejected. The presence of N. (Bessobates) is unconditionally accepted and, for practical reasons, that of N. (Prosthodocis) and N. (Netelia); in addition, the presence of N. (Paropheltes) and N. (Toxochilus) is tentatively proposed. Rev.10aCosta Rica.10ainsects10amale genitalias10amorphology10aNetelia10aparasitoid species10aphylogeny10aTryphoninae1 aCoronado-Rivera, J.  uhttps://insectafgseag.myspecies.info/en/content/filogenia-de-avispas-del-g%C3%A9nero-netelia-hymenoptera-ichneumonidae-con-%C3%A9nfasis-en-las-especie