@article {351,
	title = {Testing the Value of Six Taxonomic Groups as Biodiversity Indicators at a Local Scale},
	journal = {Conservation Biology},
	volume = {18},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {667-675},
	abstract = {We examined six groups of taxa{\textemdash}woody plants, aquatic and terrestrial herpetofauna, small ter- restrial birds, orchids, and Orthoptera{\textemdash}to determine their efficiency as biodiversity indicators in the Dadia Reserve in northern Greece. We investigated the indicator value of each group by examining the degree of congruence of its species-richness pattern with that of the other groups and the efficiency of its complementary network in conserving the other groups and biodiversity. The two techniques differed in many respects in their outputs, but they both showedwoody plants as the best biodiversity indicator. Therewas in general lowcongru- ence in the species richness patterns across the different groups. Significant relationships were found between woody plants and birds, Orthoptera and terrestrial herpetofauna, and birds and aquatic herpetofauna. None of the optimal complementary networks of the groups we examined protected all species of the other groups. Nevertheless, the complementary network of woody plants adequately conserved all groups except orchids. We conclude that the principle of complementarity must be integrated into the methodology of evaluating an indicator. In an applied context, our results provide a scientific background on which to base a biomon- itoring program for the Dadia Reserve. In a wider scope, if the group of woody plants prove an adequate biodiversity indicator for other Mediterranean areas as well, this will be important because it will facilitate conservation-related decisions for the entire Mediterranean region.},
	keywords = {biodiversity, biomonitoring, indicators, Mediterranean, reserve},
	author = {Kati, V. and Devillers, P. and Dufr{\^e}ne, M. and Legakis, A. and Vokou, D. and Lebrun, P.}
}
