02452nas a2200193   4500008004100000245007300041210006900114300001200183490000800195520183900203653002802042653002502070653002502095653002502120653002602145100002002171700001402191856005302205       2004                        eng d00aSampling saproxylic beetles: lessons from a 10-year monitoring study0 aSampling saproxylic beetles lessons from a 10year monitoring stu  a171-1810 v1203 aWe sampled saproxylic beetles using trunk window traps in two birch-dominated forests in Finland during 1990–1999. The sampling scheme, 10 traps attached to living fruiting bodies of Fomes fomentarius growing on dead birches, remained unchanged in both forests throughout the study period. Beetles belonging to 32 selected families were identified every year, whereas all species were identified during the last 4 years. Total number of identified individuals was 40,294 and number of species 583, of which 258 were saproxylic (dependent on dead wood). Species richness of rare and threatened saproxylic beetles in the samples varied a lot between the years and did not fluctuate synchronously between the forests. Variation between years was smaller when all saproxylic species were pooled together and some abundant species fluctuated synchronously in the two forests. Similarity indices and DCA- ordination did not generally suggest decreasing similarity between samples with increasing temporal isolation. Incidence-based similarities of common saproxylic species within and between forests and years were high (means 0.7–0.8), whereas those of rare saproxylics were roughly 50% smaller and much more variable. More than 75% of the common saproxylic species found during the entire 10-year period were detected already after 3 years of sampling but accumulation of rare and threatened species was much slower. Our results suggest that: (1) occurrence of rare and threatened species in samples is much less predictable than that of common species and, e.g. reserve selection based on rarities should be made cautiously; (2) estimation of total number of threatened species in a forest is very difficult, because such species accumulate slowly in the samples; (3) samples from different years can be comparable in certain cases.10along-term insect survey10asampling methodology10aspecies accumulation10atemporal variability10athreatened coleoptera1 aMartikainen, P.1 aKaila, L.  uhttps://insectafgseag.myspecies.info/fr/node/385